The eight lenses: how the Gita scores a decision
KarmaLens scores every dilemma on eight fixed lenses from -5 to +5 — so you can't cherry-pick the one that flatters you. Here's what each lens sees, and what happens when two of them disagree.
KarmaLens blog
Real, worked examples of hard decisions read through eight Bhagavad Gita lenses — and the reusable way of looking at your own dilemma that you can take with you.
KarmaLens scores every dilemma on eight fixed lenses from -5 to +5 — so you can't cherry-pick the one that flatters you. Here's what each lens sees, and what happens when two of them disagree.
A three-year relationship, one person quietly keeping score, and the stay-or-leave question that turns out to be a disclose-or-don't question in disguise. Scored end to end on eight fixed lenses.
A better offer, a startup that can't run without you, and a grudge you haven't said out loud. We score the classic quit-or-negotiate dilemma on three lenses that actually bite — and land one committed call.
A composite move-cities-vs-ageing-parents dilemma, scored on eight fixed lenses. Where duty and clean motive disagree — and how to tell guilt apart from dharma tonight, for free.
A composite founder is one spreadsheet cell away from making payroll — and from committing fraud. We score the fudged metric on four lenses that actually bite, and hand you a disclosure test you can run tonight.
Reading a verse is easy. Standing inside it while a real choice presses on you is a different skill. Here's the honest mechanics — from shloka to score — walked through one composite dilemma where two lenses openly disagree.
A pro-con list is built to tie. Watch two synthetic options get scored on the same eight lenses — and see the honesty gap flip the decision your gut called even.
A verdict is easy to nod at and hard to live with. Here's the outcome loop — 24 hours, 3 days, 7 days — and a free self-check for how to know if a decision was right after the relief wears off.
One synthetic founder dilemma, all eight lenses scored out loud, honesty and non-harm openly disagreeing — and a committed verdict that points at the one sentence you've been rounding down to 'fine.'